Demigod (PC)


4/15/2009 7:10 PM | 19 Comments | Page 1 of 2

User Ratings ( total)

0% Buy | 0% Try | 0% Fry

My Rating

Demigod (PC) Game Box
What's Hot: Multiple levels of strategic gameplay; Interesting units with unique abilities

What's Not: No story; No single-player campaign; Nasty alt-tab crash bug
John Keefer
John Keefer
Status: Saying goodbye.
Bringing a new idea to life in the strategy genre is tough. Unless the game has "Craft" or "Civilization" in the title, or an established franchise to back it up, finding an audience large enough to make the game successful is an uphill battle.

However, it is a battle that Demigod seems prepared to embrace. This "action strategy" game does have some things going for it: the combined pedigree of publisher Stardock (Galactic Civilizations) and developer Gas Powered Games (Supreme Commander), and gameplay like that of the popular Warcraft III mod called Defense of the Ancients. Those are some solid pluses.

Demigod
The Zikurat, a smaller multiplayer map.
The gameplay offers several variations on the same theme: Use your demigod to capture so many flags, destroy so many structures, kill so many other demigods, or just dominate the map. Gold collected from gold mines or killing other demigods can be used to upgrade your base, or to buy stat-boosting equipment for your demigod. Points you are awarded at the end of each match can be used to buy other special items as your tournament ranking and expertise in the game increase.

Demigod is a multiplayer game, pure and simple. It makes no attempt at a story, although the intro has such double talk and highfalutin language that you can vaguely make out that you are part of a tournament to ascend to godhood. There is no single-player campaign, just a series of eight matches against the artificial intelligence designed to get you familiar with each of the characters. The name of this action strategy game is multiplayer, and Demigod has that cold.

Skirmish mode is recommended for newcomers. You choose one of eight assassins or generals, and one of eight maps used in both single-player and multiplayer, the largest being capable of 5v5 games. Assassins are solo characters, while generals can command six to eight supporting units. Each character has a variety of skills that can be increased as experience is gained. The AI has four levels, with easy and normal being a bit too easy, and hard starting to give seasoned strategy gamers a decent game. Nightmare AI opens up when you have bested the hard AI in a single-player "tournament."

Demigod
The Queen of Thorns exhorts her minions.
What makes this strategy game different is that you only need to focus on your demigod. You don't micromanage resources and you don't manage a ton of different units. While the game gives you the feel of massive battles, your only concerns are augmenting your demigod, fortifying your base, and surrounding armies with upgrades. The AI controls your little armies, while you only control your demigod -- and, in the case of a demigod general, his very small contingent of forces.

It provides a rather refreshing change from traditional strategy games in that there is no micromanaging. The gameplay's simplicity allows for putting all your efforts into tactics and overcoming your foe. That's not to say there aren't decisions to be made, but the decisions are at the leader level, rather than deciding where to build a mine or a new base.

The art style is like an animated poster. Demigod utilizes a variation on Gas Powered Games' Supreme Commander engine, allowing players to zoom in as close as they want to get an incredibly detailed look at the character designs and battles, or zoom out for a full tactical view. The game doesn't take itself too seriously. Each character comes with its own variety of wry quips and quotes when responding to commands, capable of providing a chuckle or groan. One winged assassin character, as he is reborn after being killed in battle, pronounces that he will "take these broken wings and learn to fly again." Har.

« Prev  1  2  Next »  

Share This

  • Stumbleupon Share Button
  • Delicious Share Button
  • Reddit Share Button
  • Slashdot Share Button
  • Fark Share Button
  • Yahoo Buzz Share Button

Comments

  • Blackanchor
    Blackanchor

    5/15/2009 8:29:15 AM

    My first post here, so Hi everyone. I just had to make a comment about some reviewers who have the nerve to give Demigod a mediocre score due to network issues, but then turn around and give AOC, which is even more dependent on its network for game success, a generally high score. They praise AOC for its beauty and game mechanics and merely discuss the countless network and game performance issues while giving the game an 8.5 (Gamespot). They discuss the concepts behind Demigod and its potential but disparage it for its rough launch and network issues, then give it a 6.5 (Gamespot) Demigod at least has single player tournaments to enjoy the game while AOC can not even be played without having had to endure the bugs and crashes at launch. Is it me or is there a bias towards MMO's by reviewers? Really, come on, they gave Warhammer Online 8.5 (IGN and Gamespot) while the game was broken. Just a rant:)

    Reply »
  • Blackanchor
    Blackanchor

    5/15/2009 8:29:14 AM

    My first post here, so Hi everyone. I just had to make a comment about some reviewers who have the nerve to give Demigod a mediocre score due to network issues, but then turn around and give AOC, which is even more dependent on its network for game success, a generally high score. They praise AOC for its beauty and game mechanics and merely discuss the countless network and game performance issues while giving the game an 8.5 (Gamespot). They discuss the concepts behind Demigod and its potential but disparage it for its rough launch and network issues, then give it a 6.5 (Gamespot) Demigod at least has single player tournaments to enjoy the game while AOC can not even be played without having had to endure the bugs and crashes at launch. Is it me or is there a bias towards MMO's by reviewers? Really, come on, they gave Warhammer Online 8.5 (IGN and Gamespot) while the game was broken. Just a rant:)

    Reply »
  • Mujarin
    Mujarin

    4/25/2009 6:12:53 PM

    I'd like to point out to all the DotA fan boys that dota has been out a very, very long time and has had countless updates to make it the in depth monstrosity it is today.
    Give demigod time and stop expecting brilliance that can only come from time when its launch day. :/

    Reply »
  • Mujarin
    Mujarin

    4/25/2009 6:12:09 PM

    I'd like to point out to all the DotA fan boys that dota has been out a very, very long time and has had countless updates to make it the in depth monstrosity it is today.
    Give demigod time and stop expecting brilliance that can only come from time when its launch day. :/

    Reply »
  • JohnKeefer
    Game Trust Member
    JohnKeefer (Game Trust Writer)

    4/23/2009 12:03:20 PM

    An update:

    http://www.crispygamer.com/blogs/post/2009/04/23/Demi-oh-my-god.aspx

    Reply »
  • Crispy Specials

  • MSUSteve
    MSUSteve

    4/21/2009 3:49:09 PM

    @EyalLan: A quick glance at Metacritic reveals generally positive scores. If you read the reviews you'll see that most of the problems revolve around the now borked multiplayer setup. Scott Sharkey's review at 1up, for example, is entirely positive and yet he could not in good conscience give better than a C because multiplayer just doesn't work right yet. So no, Crispy isn't the only outlet that likes Demigod.

    Reply »
  • iDVirtuoso
    iDVirtuoso

    4/21/2009 3:36:17 PM

    thx for clarifying azianice. After reading your comments, I decided I won't buy Demigod after all because I play DotA a lot and participate in competitive matches.

    DotA is the pioneer in RTS/AOS genre gaming (I should say Starcraft is, but the concept that DotA and Demigod use is very different to those that WC and SC use). If new games of this genre do not have the features of the pioneers, then I have to say they're failures. (I can't say Demigod is a failure because I haven't played the game. But that is what I have in mind after reading azianice's comment).

    And yeah, I'm also waiting for League of Legends.

    So, to the reviewers, can you please answer my simple question: Have any of you played DotA before up to competitive level?
    =======
    iD|Virtuoso

    Reply »
  • EyalLan
    EyalLan

    4/19/2009 12:49:11 AM

    You guys are probably one of the very few game reviewers who actually liked it.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet
    Game Trust Member
    CG-Prophet (Game Trust Writer)

    4/18/2009 8:39:32 PM

    @azianice:

    Okay thanks for the clarification - forgive the rather terse tone of the previous comment.

    :)

    Reply »
  • azianice
    azianice

    4/18/2009 6:59:48 PM

    @CG-Prophet:

    Sorry, I assumed it was a 10 point scale.

    If you want to play this game, and have never experienced this genre before, then it is definitely worth the try. However, I do believe those that have played DotA a lot will find this game terribly disappointing.

    It's not that it is a bad game, it is that DotA does everything Demigod does and then some. There's more choices, more combinations (of items and teams), more strategy, more of almost everything except graphics!

    Thus, if a gamer is coming from DotA to this, there is a high probability that they will be disappointed and wanting a refund. hence why I said, wait for League of Legends. LoL is made by the developers of DotA, and are using the community forums to gather input on how to make the game.

    I hope that clears things up.

    Reply »
  • Crispy Specials

  • CG-Prophet
    Game Trust Member
    CG-Prophet (Game Trust Writer)

    4/18/2009 5:28:10 PM

    @azianice:

    Oh and they should abstain from playing a game that is available right now in favor of another game that doesn't even have a release date? Really?

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet
    Game Trust Member
    CG-Prophet (Game Trust Writer)

    4/18/2009 5:23:19 PM

    @azianice:

    Is that your personal scoring system?

    Are you using a ten point scale?

    Reply »
  • azianice
    azianice

    4/18/2009 3:14:42 PM

    jungling.

    So lets get this straight guys. If you are new to this style of game, never played DotA, yes, it is fun. It is fun to see highly detailed monsters level up and destroy other monsters. It is fun to watch yourself completely roll over competitors. But keep in mind that this is a VERY simplistic game. Use this only as an introduction to the genre, as it takes everything that made AoS games difficult and cuts it out, leaving only the fatty parts.

    What does this mean? It means this game will never be competitive. This game will not have the effect of Counter-strike or DotA. What this means is that the multiplayer base will probably die within a year or so.

    Gameplay 6.0

    All issues aside, the game is fun, and is targeted at newcomers to the genre. This game is a great introduction to the genre. But if I were you, I would wait for League of Legends.

    Score: 6.5.

    Reply »
  • azianice
    azianice

    4/18/2009 3:13:04 PM

    The reviews thus far have all said "great game, multiplayer broken". It is terribly unfortunate that the reviewers have little to no experience in the AoS type of gameplay (yes, not DotA, that's just the most popular branding of an AoS game).

    I have played DotA Allstars both competitively and recreationally and it was obvious that this game was the next game to catch my eye. And boy did it.

    This game is beautiful graphically. Character models are incredible, animations flow well, spells look as if they are truly cast by demigods, and all this with little frame rate drop on a mediocre machine. Keep in mind though, this game looks absolutely amazing in all high settings, just average in medium settings. Graphics: 9.5

    The sound, is....average. The music is quite epic and the announcer does add an aire of grandness to the game. However, you hear him shout out "double smite!" or "Ram-paging!"(its not even spoken correctly!) and can't help but go "wow, that is pretty cheesy and lame". What this cheesy-lameness (yes if Stardock can put together two random words, than so can I) creates is a game trying to knock off the announcer in the actual DotA Allstars WC3 game, but doing a very bad job at it. Sound: 6.5

    The big decider is how good is gameplay. Anyone who says this game is "deep" is definitely a casual player who has never really gotten into Defense of the Ancients.

    Deep? 8 characters?

    Deep? Sure they have trees, but they're bound to 4 active spells maximum.

    Deep? Items are put into slots, and you buy better items in "special shops". If this itemization system is complex, I would hate for any of these reviewers to play DotA. They would be confused by just the sheer amount of items, let alone the combinations to create more powerful ones.

    Deep? You go in, attack other "demigods" to keep them at bay, focus fire, and shoot at towers. Again, if any of the reviewers played DotA, they would know this game is simple without last hits, denies, and

    Reply »
  • MSUSteve
    MSUSteve

    4/16/2009 11:32:04 AM

    I've got Best Buy Reward Zone certificates burning a hole in my pocket and with nothing big coming on the game front until June, Demigod will probably be purchased at some point.

    Reply »
  • Crispy Specials

  • CG-Prophet
    Game Trust Member
    CG-Prophet (Game Trust Writer)

    4/16/2009 10:40:35 AM

    I only played for twenty minutes and I chose that half naked chick because .. well she's gentle on the eyes, but I had no idea what I was doing.

    Steve, there's a nice single player component that should help you learn the ropes. Probably a good idea as sharks like Troy here and Chick are lurking in there..

    Reply »
  • JohnKeefer
    Game Trust Member
    JohnKeefer (Game Trust Writer)

    4/16/2009 10:40:12 AM

    @MSUSteve:

    The single-player tournament allowed me to play as each character and get to learn them. Normal mode AI is a bit simplistic, but great to learn and watch how your AI partners (and enemies) work. The AI is pretty strong in this game.

    Reply »
  • MSUSteve
    MSUSteve

    4/16/2009 10:12:32 AM

    Even though I'm a single player gamer, this game sounds like it could be a lot of fun. I'd always be playing against the AI, whether solo or co-op with my brother. It sounds like the game is simple enough up front for a guy like me who gets fairly overwhelmed in most RTS games.

    Reply »
  • TroyGoodfellow
    Game Trust Member
    TroyGoodfellow (Game Trust Writer)

    4/15/2009 10:23:14 PM

    Hey now, our first game was pretty close. That stupid vampire had me on my heels for the first half of the match.

    Reply »

Want a new look on the discussion?
» Take It to the Forums

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post.
0 / 2000 used

Log In and Post

Log In and Post
Xbox 360 | PS3 | Wii | PSP | DS | PC
Crispy Gamer Buyers' Guides

Crispy Gamer
Buyer's Guides


From essential games to must-have accessories, the Game Trust tells you what you need to know about your new gaming system.

Expand Box

© Crispy Gamer, Inc. All rights reserved.

By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site,
you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.

Log In or Register with Crispy Gamer

  • Register
  • Log In
  • Facebook
Register
Log In

Use your Facebook account to log in to Crispy Gamer

You'll also be able to add your Facebook friends to Crispy Gamer and post your Crispy Gamer activity in your Facebook feed.

Reasons to Join Crispy Gamer

  • It's Free
  • Leave Comments on Crispy Articles and Blogs
  • Enter Contests and Win Great Prizes
  • Converse With Other Gamers in Our Forums
  • Share What’s Up With Custom Status Text
  • Track Your Activity on Your Personal User Page
  • Chat with Friends in Real-Time