» Home » Crispy Gamer Forums
Mercenaries 2: World in Flames
Administrator
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 03, 2008 6:53:45 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administrators
Joined: 5/7/2009
Posts: 3,088
Mercenaries 2: World in Flames

After promising gamers a massive open world, seamless co-op and tons of destructible environments, does Pandemic deliver? Billy Berghammer wrought havoc in the sequel to Mercenaries to find out.
w1ndst0rm
#2 Posted : Friday, September 05, 2008 10:39:40 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 344
Billy, what is with the royal use of the word 'we'?

Nevermind, I checked out your Bio and you have Wave Race 64 in your top ten.

Forgive me my liege.
darthjoe
#3 Posted : Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:38:46 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 5
Eh, I really must disagree. The aim was real heavy, and the weapons were so inaccurate that you couldn't get a quick kill. It seriously limited your strategic options, forcing you to play one way only. airstrikes usually needed a beacon to be thrown. Couldn't I have had a laser or satelite option, or even used the binoculars? Being close to your target kind of defeated the whole purpose of the airstrike. When you combine the other issues, you have a game that isn't even as good as the first.
Candrian
#4 Posted : Sunday, September 14, 2008 5:48:40 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 9
Good review for a great game, I just want to make one addition: If you were annoyed at how GTA games have been over-complicating themselves then this is a game for you, it has a glorious simplicity of a sandbox with plenty of explosives thrown in.
darthjoe
#5 Posted : Friday, September 19, 2008 4:44:04 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 5
Really, I'd have said to fry it. the game is obsessed with close combat, the only remotely usable weapons were the sniper rifles. Headshots were impossible to get (and thus a fast kill) from any sort of distance, and bullets for all weapons are slow and all are inncacurate. Airstrikes need to be SMOKE DESIGNATED!?! WTF?! Having to get close in DEFEATS the purpose of the damn thing in the first place! Also, what happened to stun grenades? This is like 3 steps back from mercs 1 (to 1998).
darthjoe
#6 Posted : Saturday, September 27, 2008 7:24:17 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/1/2009
Posts: 5
are you kidding me? mercs 2 is similar in only the most basic concept, it plays NOTHING like the first game. Do not get this game. It is dissapointing and very dull
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Crispy Gamer Theme by Christopher Buecheler
Powered by YAF 1.9.3 RC2 | YAF © 2003-2008, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.066 seconds.

Xbox 360 | PS3 | Wii | PSP | DS | PC
The Games That Time Forgot

The Games That Time Forgot


The games we're pulling together in this feature won't appear on any of those best-of lists and get confused looks when you mention them in conversation. Just because time has forgotten these titles, though, doesn't mean you should forget them, too.

» Read On

Expand Box

© Crispy Gamer, Inc. All rights reserved.

By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site,
you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.