Press Pass: Blogging by the Numbers


5/7/2009 6:38 PM | 10 Comments | Page 2 of 4

Kyle Orland
Kyle Orland
Status: Ba-GAWK
While the 1UP News section doesn't end up looking so good as far as original content (the only news post that could be considered "original" was a promo for 1UP's Game Night), comparing it directly to the blogs is not quite fair. 1UP posts plenty of original content (previews, reviews, interviews, features, etc.) that does not show up in the news feed. Still, the news section itself seems stereotypically blog-like in its reliance on official press releases and links to other sources for its content. I'm not trying to pick on 1UP News here; the same could be said for many other non-blog "news" sections on other sites. A few exceptions -- such as Gamasutra, VG247, Siliconera, Shacknews, and Edge -- tend to include more original content, and, not coincidentally, end up getting links from a lot of blogs in the process. Future studies may look into these sites in more detail.

Press Pass: Blogging by the Numbers
Figure 2 (Click to expand)

Of course, the blogs got a bit of help in their original content this week. With E3 coming up, Gamers' Day Events from the likes of Capcom, Namco/Bandai and Sony provided plenty of fodder for previews. A full 38 percent of the original content on the "big three" blogs for the week were previews and/or impressions of games from these events (see Fig. 2). But the blogs' original content was much deeper than that. Joystiq had a video tour and interview focusing on the historic Funspot arcade, for example. Kotaku featured a video interview with Dead Rising 2 producer Keiji Inafune alongside a thoughtful editorial on the future of art games. Destructoid featured a wide range of reviews for both classic and current games, as well as "musings" columns culled from its numerous user blogs. Each blog had podcasts, contests, community outreach and plenty of other content that's hard to deride as simply being transcribed from somewhere else.

Not just that, but the blogs managed to break some news as well. Joystiq broke the release date for the long-anticipated (but as of Joystiq's posting not-yet-confirmed) arrival of Peggle on the iPhone. Kotaku found new information about wearable Achievements for Xbox Live Avatars through a tipster-submitted survey. Heck, even Destructoid found a great deal on The Eye of Judgment at Wal-Mart for its readers. These might not be groundbreaking investigative reports on the scale of Watergate, but they show how blogs are adding to the information stream, not just taking from it.

What kind of stuff are they writing about?

Press Pass: Blogging by the Numbers
Figure 3 (Click to expand)

On to the second major criticism of blogs -- that they pad their post counts with screenshots and rumors and cultural fluff that's not real news. Even disregarding the blogs' original content (which, as discussed above, is often real news by any definition), my survey showed that blogs cover plenty of topics besides cakes that look like game systems.

Unsurprisingly, nearly 40 percent of the blog posts I saw discussed specific information about a game or games: release dates, newly revealed gameplay details, information about downloadable content and so on. If this shouldn't be the bread-and-butter of any gaming news site, I don't know what should. (Indeed, these game-related posts made up 54 percent of 1UP's news section for the week.) On top of that, another 30 percent of blog posts dealt with the industry itself -- the kind of behind-the-scenes news you'd see in the business section of the newspaper. These categories heavily outweighed the 20 percent of posts that were simply devoted to screenshots or trailers and another 20 percent that dealt with cultural ephemera (like cakes). Another 10 percent dealt with consumer news -- deals, product announcements, etc. [Editor's note: Percentages don't add up to 100 because one post can fit into many categories.]

« Prev  1  2  3  4  Next »  

Share This

  • Stumbleupon Share Button
  • Delicious Share Button
  • Reddit Share Button
  • Slashdot Share Button
  • Fark Share Button
  • Yahoo Buzz Share Button

Comments

  • Palalong
    Palalong

    5/8/2009 3:52:32 PM

    I'm just posting to tell cygnusblue: fuck off.

    I invoke rule 24 of the internet!
    yeah maybe it's been done before, but Orland made an effort to bring some new insight to the table, what have you done lately cygnus? trolls do not = expert journalism critic.

    Reply »
  • RyanKuo

    5/8/2009 10:55:55 AM

    (This is why I never liked science.)

    Reply »
  • bookninja
    bookninja

    5/8/2009 1:21:22 AM

    "In fact, it lines up nicely with a 2008 study that found 80 percent of quality UK newspaper content came from newswire or PR sources."

    The actual quote from the link you posted is, "Some 80 per cent of news stories in the quality UK national newspapers are at least partly made up of recycled newswire or PR copy, according to new research." By skipping the "at least partly made up" qualifier you distort your source to strengthen your argument. In addition, the study *included* the "quality" UK national newspapers. The recycled material in this subset of papers was less (52-69%). The details of this study are better explained here: http://is.gd/xF7Q.

    You do not detail how you determined originality making judgment of your comparison impossible. The standard for originality in the study you cite is that stories are not "wholly or mainly or partly based on information from pr departments or wire stories." This is a high bar for originality, please tell us how you determined the originality of a blog post. Do you still have access to all the PR copy and wire stories?

    You are correct stating, "To say that these bloggers only take content from other sources is obviously unfair." But the comparison to the Cardiff study weakens you case for taking blog journalists seriously due to the numerous avoidable errors I've mentioned.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet

    5/7/2009 9:47:21 PM

    He just did with this post? Really?

    These two articles use different methodology, and come to two different conclusions.

    I'll trust Kyle's numbers and conclusion for one reason: He didn't go into it with his mind already made up.

    Reply »
  • CaptainHomeless

    5/7/2009 8:19:07 PM

    Insinuating that this article is somehow theft because of its similarities to another article is like saying that ESPN.com "stole" the idea of writing about Kevin Garnett's absence from the NBA playoffs from SportsIllustrated.com.

    Related or similar subjects != theft.

    Reply »
  • KyleOrland

    5/7/2009 8:13:06 PM

    @Registeringtocommentlikeits1998:

    Yeah, they were really picked pretty much at random. If I did it again, I might add Gamespot and/or IGN's game feed.

    Reply »
  • KyleOrland

    5/7/2009 8:08:26 PM

    @CygnusBlue:

    Wow.

    This may come off as hard to believe, but I had no idea knowledge of this NegativeGamer piece before right now. Honest. Just hadn't seen it. If I had, I doubt I'd have even bothered with my piece. You did a great job crunching this kind of data before me, and did some excellent analysis.

    That said, I do consider myself an actual journalist. Even if I had seen the Negative Gamer piece before today, that doesn't give them an exclusive patent on the idea of analyzing blog content. It took an _exceptional_ amount of work to do my own number crunching of a whole week's worth of data (different data than NegativeGamer used, BTW) and do my own analysis of said data.

    Calling this piece simple theft and implying that I'm "not a journalist" because someone else did a _similar_ (not identical) article recently just doesn't make sense to me.

    Reply »
  • Registeringtocommentlikeits1998
    Registeringtocommentlikeits1998

    5/7/2009 8:04:05 PM

    The problem with Joystiq, Kotaku and Destructoid isn't what percentage of their content is lifted from elsewhere, it's that 100% of their content is editorialised by vile self-satisfied poltroons.

    Picking 1UP and Wired as your 'legitimate' outlets is just priceless.

    Reply »
  • SariatheCat
    SariatheCat

    5/7/2009 7:57:56 PM

    @CygnusBlue:

    "HAY THERES SOMEONE WHO DID SOMETHING SIMILAR ONE TIME --- UR A CHEAT"

    The article you linked to pales in comparison to Kyle's in-depth analysis here. The author even admits that his "basic maths skills are kinda crappy," so I would even take his data with a grain of salt. The post is in fact much more of a whine-fest than an in-depth analysis of online game journalism.

    As with almost any study, there have been similar studies like it conducted in the past. Which doesn't mean a new study, especially that which expands research (which Kyle's article clearly does in every dimension), is just a blatant copy or unimportant or even unoriginal.

    And having different perspectives on the same topic is integral to seeing the big picture. Your comment's negative, insulting nature is harmful to the discussion. A better way to approach this would have been, "Something similar to this has been done, why don't you check it out?" As in, "I would like to ADD to this discussion, not attempt to shut it down or take anything away from it."

    Reply »
  • CygnusBlue
    CygnusBlue

    5/7/2009 7:45:50 PM

    Blogs just publish press releases and stuff from other outlets. They don't do any original writing.

    All the blogs just steal stuff from each other (and the partisan corollary, [Blog A] just steals everything from [Blog B]).

    This is so true. Because, you know, you just did it with this post.

    This was done almost three weeks ago.

    http://negativegamer.com/2009/04/20/45-of-all-the-news-you-read-is-from-a-press-release-and-other-interesting-stories/

    I hope you don't actually call yourself a journalist.

    Reply »

Want a new look on the discussion?
» Take It to the Forums

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post.
0 / 2000 used

Log In and Post

Log In and Post

The Chatter Box

  • Recent
  • Active
  • Status
ChknKitty

ChknKitty Says

Wow, people win every day in the Chicken Out contest! Sign up and win.

Xbox 360 | PS3 | Wii | PSP | DS | PC
The Games That Time Forgot

The Games That Time Forgot


The games we're pulling together in this feature won't appear on any of those best-of lists and get confused looks when you mention them in conversation. Just because time has forgotten these titles, though, doesn't mean you should forget them, too.

» Read On

Expand Box

© Crispy Gamer, Inc. All rights reserved.

By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site,
you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.

Log In or Register with Crispy Gamer

  • Register
  • Log In
  • Facebook
Register
Log In

Use your Facebook account to log in to Crispy Gamer

You'll also be able to add your Facebook friends to Crispy Gamer and post your Crispy Gamer activity in your Facebook feed.

Reasons to Join Crispy Gamer

  • It's Free
  • Leave Comments on Crispy Articles and Blogs
  • Enter Contests and Win Great Prizes
  • Converse With Other Gamers in Our Forums
  • Share What’s Up With Custom Status Text
  • Track Your Activity on Your Personal User Page
  • Chat with Friends in Real-Time